6215 2008-11-11 11:41:33 +0000 --02-- not a valid gMonth value (ST_facets00119m) 2010-04-16 16:17:49 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Test Suite NIST tests 2006-11-06 Other Linux RESOLVED DUPLICATE 6901 P2 normal --- 1 tobias.koenig ht David_E3 mike public-xml-schema-testsuite oldest_to_newest 22404 0 tobias.koenig 2008-11-11 11:41:33 +0000 Hej, test case ST_facets00119m seems to be invalid to me, as --02-- is no valid gMonth value (as far as I can read from the spec it should be --02). Nevertheless the test case is marked as valid... Ciao, Tobias 22405 1 mike 2008-11-11 12:03:15 +0000 I think you are referring to a test in the Sun tests, test set SType, test group st_facets00119m. Yes, the format --mm-- is bogus. It was wrongly permitted in the first publication of XSD 1.0 and was subsequently withdrawn by erratum. I permit this format in Saxon because the error has found its way into so many books and tutorials, not to mention user-written applications, that it causes less hassle to accept it than to reject it. But it's clearly wrong. This illustrates the problems of fixing a spec by erratum. 35108 2 ht 2010-04-16 16:14:24 +0000 WG agreed to fix this in same way as we fix 6901 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6901 ***