<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>621</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-03-23 10:40:45 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>CDL - Explain what a ChoreographyNotation is</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-12-01 16:43:45 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WS Choreography</product>
          <component>Spec: Editorial</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2004Mar/0025.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>--</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</assigned_to>
          
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1585</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</who>
    <bug_when>2004-03-23 10:40:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Section 4.10
Please explain what a ChoreographyNotation is? What is the basic 
difference between the element definitions and a notation?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1762</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</who>
    <bug_when>2004-04-26 10:59:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The use of notation terminology is used throughout and needs group discussion. </thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2175</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</who>
    <bug_when>2004-08-31 09:04:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Monica Martin writes:

The original section in which this was held no longer applies but the 
original question does [1].
Notation (word) is used for Choreography, Activity and WorkUnit. There 
does not appear to be any visible reason why xxxxNotation is used (Each 
is a complex type; although there are several other ones besides these 
three). In addition, notations are generally referenced for Section 2.1 
where the choreography model is overviewed (includes these three and 
many others). 

If some type of priority, hierarchy or compositional aspect was to be 
inferred for the use of Notation (for Choreography, Activity and 
WorkUnit), I would suggest you express that as descriptions in the 
technical specification. This would alleviate any confusion between the 
general choreography model overview, the notational conventions (section 
1.1) and the complexTypes defined in the WS-CDL schema.

The rest of the specification draft seems to flow in its use of syntax, 
constructs, and elements or attributes. Perhaps Nick could provide 
further detail why &apos;Notation&apos; was used. 

[1] Reference CDL working draft, 24 July 2004.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2004Aug/0023.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2430</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</who>
    <bug_when>2004-09-30 20:45:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>the &lt;blah&gt;-notation usage is being used to identify left hand side non 
terminals. editorial suggestion to include the non-terminal names in the psuedo 
bnf fragments.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>