6013 2008-09-02 14:26:12 +0000 [schema11] new examples needed 2009-10-12 14:09:46 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.1 only PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED editorial, resolved P2 normal --- 1 johnarwe cmsmcq cmsmcq David_E3 www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 21729 0 johnarwe 2008-09-02 14:26:12 +0000 3.3.2.5 Examples of Element Declarations Example of default type decl as allowed by 3.3.2.1 Common Mapping Rules for Element Declarations {type table}.{default type definition} clause 1 (no test on final <alternative>) 3.10.1 The Wildcard Schema Component {namespace constraint} provides for ·validation· of attribute and element items that: item 2 I think I know what you're after here, but text is pretty convoluted. Alternative might be to sub-bullet it or provide and link to an example. 21869 1 johnarwe 2008-09-11 18:46:03 +0000 The SML working group chose NOT to endorse this bug on its call of 2008-09-11 25039 2 sandygao 2009-05-08 16:53:12 +0000 During its 2009-05-08 telecon, the schema WG adopted a proposal to partially address this issue. The proposal can be found at (member-only): http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.omni.20090508.html The type alternative example was updated to show how {default type definition} can get its value from an <xs:alternative> that doesn't have a "test" attribute. I'm leaving this bug hoping that the comment on the wildcard will be addressed by a future proposal. 25068 3 johnarwe 2009-05-08 17:44:04 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > During its 2009-05-08 telecon, the schema WG adopted a proposal to partially > address this issue. Looks like it addresses 3.3.2.5 for me. 26065 4 David_E3 2009-07-24 16:11:20 +0000 Editors will retry item 2. 28204 5 cmsmcq 2009-10-10 01:37:09 +0000 On its call today, the WG accepted a proposal to add ##local to one of the examples at the beginning of 3.10 and describe it briefly in the following prose. The revised example reads: <xs:any notNamespace="##targetNamespace ##local"/> and the revised paragraph (list item 2 in the list following the component and property record tableaux) now reads: 2. ({variety} not and {namespaces} a set whose members are either namespace names or ·absent·) have any namespace other than the specified namespaces and/or, if ·absent· is included in the set, are namespace-qualified; (see this example, which accepts only namespace-qualified names distinct from the target namespace; the '##local' in the schema document maps to the value .absent. in the {namespace constraint} property). 28229 6 cmsmcq 2009-10-10 20:40:29 +0000 The change described in comment 5 (like the one mentioned in comment 2) has now been integrated into the status-quo documents and may be inspected there in the fair copy and in the copy showing changes since the CR draft of 30 April (in the latter the change may be easier to spot since it has colored diff markup). http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.html http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.diff-wd.html (both links member-only) Accordingly, I'm marking this issue resolved. John, as the originator of this issue, you are requested to review the changes and indicate either by closing the bug that you are happy with this disposition of the comment or by reopening it that you are not satisfied. If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks we shall assume that you are satisfied. Thank you for this comment and your help in trying to make the spec less trying for readers. 28270 7 johnarwe 2009-10-12 14:09:46 +0000 looks great, thanks