<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>5821</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-06-29 08:28:42 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>meta/@scheme missing</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2010-10-04 14:31:36 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>NEEDSINFO</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>TrackerIssue</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Julian Reschke">julian.reschke</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</assigned_to>
          <cc>ian</cc>
    
    <cc>laura.lee.carlson</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>mjs</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>20976</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Julian Reschke">julian.reschke</who>
    <bug_when>2008-06-29 08:28:42 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This is a reminder that the removal of meta/@scheme needs to be reviewed.

Note that RFC 2731 (&quot;Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTML&quot;) recommends using this attribute for type information, and that &lt;http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/metadata.html&gt; indicates &quot;Continuing up the chart we see scheme and lang. Further research will be needed to find out how scheme is used.&quot;.

Further note that RFC 2731 seems to propose a solution to a problem that RDFa also covers. So adoption of a RDFa compatible format may also take care of this problem.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>20977</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2008-06-29 08:47:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Was this bug intended for me or for the working group in general? It&apos;s not clear who the &quot;reminder&quot; is for.

&lt;meta scheme&gt; was studied years ago, before the W3C got involved I think. I don&apos;t plan to study it again unless there&apos;s some new data that needs considering.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>20978</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Julian Reschke">julian.reschke</who>
    <bug_when>2008-06-29 09:05:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; Was this bug intended for me or for the working group in general? It&apos;s not
&gt; clear who the &quot;reminder&quot; is for.

It&apos;s a reminder for all of us.

&gt; &lt;meta scheme&gt; was studied years ago, before the W3C got involved I think. I
&gt; don&apos;t plan to study it again unless there&apos;s some new data that needs
&gt; considering.

Then it would be totally useful if you could add a pointer to that research.
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>20979</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2008-06-29 09:22:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;ve no idea where it was documented. A search in the archives for &quot;scheme attribute&quot; would probably find it, if it was done in response to e-mails sent to the WHATWG list. If it was done without prompting then I doubt there&apos;s any public record of it.

Reassigning to Mike to get it off my list -- FWIW, I believe the correct procedure here for working group reminders is to use the tracker tool rather than Bugzilla, but Mike can probably give better guidance here.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>29727</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Julian Reschke">julian.reschke</who>
    <bug_when>2009-11-25 12:25:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>meta/@scheme is not defined in HTML5, but it was in HTML4. Note that the text under &quot;12.2 Non-conforming features&quot;:

&quot;scheme on meta elements

    Use only one scheme per field, or make the scheme declaration part of the value.&quot;

can&apos;t be considered a proper description.

On the other hand, the document currently claims in the IANA registration for text/html to be a complete definition.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>29728</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Julian Reschke">julian.reschke</who>
    <bug_when>2009-11-25 12:34:57 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Note:

   Changes should be requested only when there are serious omissions or
   errors in the published specification.  When review is required, a
   change request may be denied if it renders entities that were valid
   under the previous definition invalid under the new definition.

&lt;http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4288#section-9&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>29870</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Maciej Stachowiak">mjs</who>
    <bug_when>2009-12-01 19:50:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>It looks like this has an overdue request to create a tracker issue. Mike?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>29910</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2009-12-03 15:08:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; It looks like this has an overdue request to create a tracker issue. Mike?

I&apos;ll try to get it added today, but I would be happy if somebody else were to do it in the mean time. Julian?

</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>30385</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Maciej Stachowiak">mjs</who>
    <bug_when>2010-01-04 14:38:14 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>putting this bug in RESOLVED state since that&apos;s the right state for a tracker request.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>30387</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Julian Reschke">julian.reschke</who>
    <bug_when>2010-01-04 14:50:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Re-opening until we actually do have a related tracker issue.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>30388</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Maciej Stachowiak">mjs</who>
    <bug_when>2010-01-04 15:43:57 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #9)
&gt; Re-opening until we actually do have a related tracker issue.
&gt; 

The need for a tracker issue is indicated by the TrackerRequest keyword. Per the process, it&apos;s correct for a bug awaiting a tracker issue to be resolved and marked TrackerRequest. See &lt;http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html&gt;.

Note: I have a query for all bugs tagged with TrackerRequest and I will make sure they all get into the tracker.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>31312</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Julian Reschke">julian.reschke</who>
    <bug_when>2010-01-28 14:44:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Raised as http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/99</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>