5785 2008-06-23 04:10:19 +0000 errors in xhtml-mobile11.dtd DTD 2008-07-03 16:26:23 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Validator check HEAD PC Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 major --- 1 bryce2 dave.null ot www-validator-cvs oldest_to_newest 20738 0 bryce2 2008-06-23 04:10:19 +0000 Validate this: <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.1//EN" "http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/DTD/xhtml-mobile11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <title>test</title> </head> <body> <p>test</p> </body> </html> You'll get 10 errors with line numbers that are not even in the source file. It seems to be having some issues with the DTD, and falsely blaming the input source code. So this is really two bug report: improper line numbers, and a parsing issue with the 1.1 DTD. ---------------------- Replace the DTD with 1.0 or 1.2 and it works fine: <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.0//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd"> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.2//EN" "http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/DTD/xhtml-mobile12.dtd"> 20746 1 ot 2008-06-23 12:56:14 +0000 Hi Bryce, This is caused by problems with the xhtml-mobile11.dtd from OMA/WAP Forum. I've contacted them regarding this issue. The issue with errors in DTDs being shown as if they were errors in the document is already recorded in Bug 301. Thanks. 20753 2 bryce2 2008-06-23 17:36:58 +0000 Yep. I've repeatedly reported bugs in those DTDs, but to no effect. The 1.0 and 1.2 DTD's break my Java Integrated Development Environment, with a file not found error on: http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/DTD/xhtml-special.ent 20960 3 ot 2008-06-27 13:04:41 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > This is caused by problems with the xhtml-mobile11.dtd from OMA/WAP Forum. I've > contacted them regarding this issue. Shane looked at the DTD for xhtml-mobile11. found a typo, and reported it to the right people, who ack'd the issue. I expect the DTD should be fixed very soon. 21046 4 ot 2008-07-03 15:56:50 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > Shane looked at the DTD for xhtml-mobile11. found a typo, and reported it to > the right people, who ack'd the issue. I expect the DTD should be fixed very > soon. The DTD has been fixed on the OMA website. 21051 5 bryce2 2008-07-03 16:26:23 +0000 Thanks, that's great! Another blow for the cause of valid markup. I hope that the Bug #301 issue is also eventually dealt with.