5691 2008-05-16 09:32:30 +0000 K2-Literals-6 expected results 2008-05-20 11:13:01 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Query Test Suite XML Query Test Suite unspecified PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 vano_msu frans.englich public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 20135 0 vano_msu 2008-05-16 09:32:30 +0000 K2-Literals-6 result depends on impelemntation defined rounding algorithm. It seems it should be based on the following rule (F&O 17.1.1): "In casting to xs:decimal or to a type derived from xs:decimal, if the value is not too large or too small but nevertheless cannot be represented accurately with the number of decimal digits available to the implementation, the implementation may round to the nearest representable value or may raise a dynamic error [err:FOCA0006]. The choice of rounding algorithm and the choice between rounding and error behavior and is implementation-defined." but not on "In casting to numerics, if the value is too large or too small to be accurately represented by the implementation, it is handled as an overflow or underflow as defined in 6.2 Operators on Numeric Values." like in K2-Literals-4,5. 20159 1 frans.englich 2008-05-20 09:42:58 +0000 The query reads: (:*******************************************************:) (: Test: K2-Literals-6 :) (: Written by: Frans Englich :) (: Date: 2007-11-22T11:31:21+01:00 :) (: Purpose: Use a relatively large xs:decimal literal. :) (:*******************************************************:) 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.1 The expected results is FOAR0002 and: 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.1 For the baseline, it to me seems no rounding has been done. Do you suggest that: * FOAR0002 is replaced with FOCA0006 * An additional numeric baseline is added with the number that your implementation in question produce. An alternative to this is to accept any output, but that's preferably avoided. 20160 2 vano_msu 2008-05-20 10:08:12 +0000 It enough for me to add the following value: 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 However, FOCA0006 is better here also I suppose. 20167 3 frans.englich 2008-05-20 11:11:03 +0000 Should be fixes in CVS. Added the suggested baseline, and changed to error code FOCA0006. Feel free to change status to CLOSED if the resolution is satisfactory. 20168 4 vano_msu 2008-05-20 11:13:01 +0000 Ok. Thanks.