<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>5497</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-02-20 16:55:18 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Consistent Model Validation title</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-02-21 20:12:52 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>SML</product>
          <component>Interchange Format</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>LC</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Kirk Wilson">kirk.wilson</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Valentina Popescu">popescu</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="SML Working Group discussion list">public-sml</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19151</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Kirk Wilson">kirk.wilson</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-20 16:55:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Section 4: suggesting changing paragraph title &quot;Consistent Model Validation&quot; to &quot;Constrained Model Validation&quot;.  &quot;Consistent model validation&quot; is nowhere else mentioned in the document and may imply that SML-IF model validation will avoid inconsistencies in the SML model validation process.  The theme here is that interchange set validation is a constrained form of model validation.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19153</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="James Lynn">james.lynn</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-20 17:02:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In reading this section, it seems to me that the intent really is to provide a consistent way of interchanging models. Naturally, this is done through constraints, but I&apos;m not convinced the title Constrained Model Validation reflects the intent.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19155</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Kirk Wilson">kirk.wilson</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-20 17:18:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Actually, I think the situation is a little worse than a co-ordinating the paragraph title with the alleged intent and/or content of the paragraph.  This paragraph is intended to set the stage for section 4.5, which has a totally different title from either the original or the suggested revision.  I think section 4.5 could be better express to make it more explicit about the positive role of the constraints rather than the negative perspective that the section seems to take: &quot;Don&apos;t use the constraint and interoperability is not guaranteed.&quot;  (But I think fixing this focus of 4.5 could wait to after LC.)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19156</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Virginia Smith">virginia.smith</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-20 17:30:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I suggest dropping &apos;consistent&apos; altogether. The &apos;topic being addressed&apos; (as indicated in sentence 1 of the section) in this paragraph is simply &quot;Model Validation&quot;. I think that should suffice and is consistent with the other paragraph headings - which take no position on their topics. So my suggestion is to use just &quot;Model Validation&quot; for the paragraph heading.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19169</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Virginia Smith">virginia.smith</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-21 19:32:23 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Resolution on 2/21 call is to remove word &quot;consistent&quot; from para heading.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19174</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Valentina Popescu">popescu</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-21 20:12:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>fixed as proposed in comment #4</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>