5430 2008-01-25 23:41:26 +0000 Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages 2008-02-14 20:29:14 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SML Core LC PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED resolved P2 normal LC 1 popescu popescu public-sml oldest_to_newest 18589 0 popescu 2008-01-25 23:41:26 +0000 Bullet 3 under the Localization of natural-language messages is unclear in regard to where the locid attribute can be defined. The section in discussion : 'Elements in instance documents where containing element has textual content, whenever allowed by schema.' The intention was to define the locid attribute as being used on elements that can have textual content. 18590 1 popescu 2008-01-25 23:57:55 +0000 A similar issue in section 8.1.7 sml:locid This attribute can be defined on the sch:assert, sch:report **and on any element with a textual content, whenever the schema allows that**. 18646 2 johnarwe 2008-01-30 20:07:08 +0000 The distinction discussed was the possible inference by readers, because of the "where schema allows" clause, that schema validity assessment might be required. It was not the intent of that clause to imply any such requirement. 18671 3 popescu 2008-01-31 20:57:47 +0000 reviewed in 01/31 meeting; resolution to mark editorial 18812 4 popescu 2008-02-07 04:15:29 +0000 Two changes applied In section 7. Localization of Natural Language Messages Replaced :'Elements in instance documents where containing element has textual content, whenever allowed by schema.' With : 'Elements in instance documents with textual content.' In section 9.1.7 sml:locid Replaced: 'This attribute can be defined on the sch:assert, sch:report and on any element with a textual content, whenever the schema allows that.' With: 'This attribute can be defined on the sch:assert, sch:report and on any element with a textual content.' 18879 5 kumarp 2008-02-08 08:04:16 +0000 +1 for the changes. 19033 6 johnarwe 2008-02-14 02:05:36 +0000 one nit in 9.1.7 from: element with a textual content to : element with textual content 19045 7 popescu 2008-02-14 14:48:13 +0000 Comment #6 has been addressed Replaced 'with a textual content' with ' with textual content'