<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>5402</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-01-22 22:28:10 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Remove text concerning references &quot;expressed in multiple ways&quot;</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-02-14 19:56:56 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>SML</product>
          <component>Core</component>
          <version>FPWD</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>MacOS X</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Virginia Smith">virginia.smith</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="James Lynn">james.lynn</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="SML Working Group discussion list">public-sml</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18468</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Virginia Smith">virginia.smith</who>
    <bug_when>2008-01-22 22:28:10 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In section 4.2.4, the 2nd sentence applies to the definition of reference schemes and, as such, does not belong in this section which is about elements being targets multiple references.

Proposal:
1. Remove 2nd sentence in section 4.2.4 Multiple References - &quot;These reference elements may use different schemes and/or be expressed in different ways&quot;

2. Add sentence to section 4.2.3 similar to the removed sentence to indicate that a  target may be reached by 2 different instantiations of the same reference scheme e.g., 2 different xpath expressions may identify the same element.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18694</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="James Lynn">james.lynn</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-04 13:44:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>It seems to me that 4.2.3 is referring to the case where a reference element has two different schemes or possibly two different instances of the same scheme to refer to the same element. 4.2.4 is talking about two different references, i.e. two different elements, possibly unrelated, which happen to refer to the same target element.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18803</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Kumar Pandit">kumarp</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-07 01:52:42 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>[1]
+1 for bullet #1 in the original proposal.

[2]
The definition in 4.2.3 seems to be complete. No need to add the removed sentence (or a sentence like it) to 4.2.3.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18829</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Virginia Smith">virginia.smith</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-07 19:36:19 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Resolution: fix per proposal amended by comment #2. However, editor to review spec and make sure that the proposal item #2 statement is expressed somewhere in the spec and if not add this as a non-normative statement.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18971</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="James Lynn">james.lynn</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-12 16:34:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Removed second sentence in 4.2.4 and added similar sentence in SML Refernce Scheme definition (2.2).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18974</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="John Arwe">johnarwe</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-12 21:46:36 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>4.2.4 Multiple References  

from: An element in a document MAY be targeted by multiple SML reference. 
to:   An element in a document MAY be targeted by multiple SML references. </thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18975</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="James Lynn">james.lynn</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-12 22:10:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The text at one point was &quot;An element in a document MAY be targeted by multiple SML reference elements.&quot; I&apos;m not sure if the removal of the word &quot;elements&quot; was intentional, but it was, obviously this needs to be changed as in comment #5.
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18996</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Kumar Pandit">kumarp</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-13 07:56:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>+1 for the changes (as ammended by comment# 5)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19014</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Virginia Smith">virginia.smith</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-13 22:28:14 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The change from &quot;SML reference element&quot; to &quot;SML reference&quot; was intentional. This change was made throughout the spec as part of bug #5388. </thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>