<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>5399</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-01-22 13:27:15 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>SML typos</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-01-22 20:21:48 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>SML</product>
          <component>Core</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="John Arwe">johnarwe</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Kumar Pandit">kumarp</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="SML Working Group discussion list">public-sml</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18455</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="John Arwe">johnarwe</who>
    <bug_when>2008-01-22 13:27:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>1. Introduction, 1. SML references 
&quot;does support references within elements in the same document through xs:ID,&quot;
replace &quot;within&quot; with &quot;between&quot; to &quot;to&quot;

4.2.2 Consistent References
from: scheme resolves to a target that&apos;s different from the target resolved to
to:   scheme resolves to a target        different from the target resolved to

4.2.4 Multiple References
context: An element in a document MAY be targeted by multiple reference elements. These reference elements 
from: These reference elements 
to  : The referencing elements
(this one is optional.  it is not especially hard to read the existing text correctly, the revision simply reads more clearly to me)

4.2.5 Null References
from: 4.2.5 Null References
to  : 4.2.5 SML Null References
for consistency with 4.1.2

4.2.5 Null References
from: A      null reference is 
to  : An SML null reference is 

4.2.6 deref() XPath Extension Function, item 1
from: recognizes no scheme used in the reference,   then deref() returns no target for R.
to  : recognizes no scheme used in the reference R, then deref() returns no target for R.
(both before and after this spot we refer to the reference element as R already)

4.2.6 deref() XPath Extension Function, item 2.c
from: resolves to a target that&apos;s different from
to  : resolves to a target        different from

4.3 Reference Schemes, final paragraph
from: A schema definition MAY impose
to  : A scheme definition MAY impose
             -
4.3.1 SML URI Scheme, item 2
from:                                The SML URI scheme is resolved using
to  : An SML reference element using the SML URI scheme is resolved using
(this makes it consistent with item 1 same list)

4.3.1 SML URI Scheme, item 2.a
from: sans
to  : ignoring any

4.3.1 SML URI Scheme, item 2.a
from: appropriate operation defined for the     scheme used in that URI reference
to  : appropriate operation defined for the URI scheme used in that URI reference
(this is a particularly important place to fix an unqualified use of &quot;scheme&quot;, since this &quot;scheme&quot; refers to the URI scheme within a particular instance of the SML reference scheme... I realize we have a separate bug to weed out all unqualified &quot;scheme&quot; uses, but it would be too easy to get this one wrong)

4.3.1 SML URI Scheme, item 4
Need to be sure we define the BNF syntax elements, like ::=, used here.  Did not see that we already did so.  Probably a matter of pointing to where that syntax is defined.  RFC3986 probably contains such a pointer in its references.  Goes in section 2.1

4.3.1.1 The smlxpath1() scheme, item 1
from: Scheme name: smlxpath1.
to  : Scheme name: smlxpath1
(i.e. remove the trailing period, lest someone believe that is part of the literal)

4.4 Constraints on References
The {property-name} notation was borrowed from XML Schema.  Should be attributed in section 2.1

4.4 Constraints on References, target*
from: And 3             new properties
to  : SML defines three new properties
(consistency with the acyclic text above this)

4.4.1 sml:acyclic
from: sml:acyclic is used to specify that           a cycle is not allowed 
to  : sml:acyclic is used to specify whether or not a cycle is not allowed

4.4.1 sml:acyclic
from: allowed for an SML reference      type
to  : allowed on instances of a complex type 

4.4.2.1 Mapping from schema, item 2.b
from: then{target element}  of ED is the same as that of EB.
to:   then {target element} of ED is the same as that of EB.
          -
4.4.2.2 Schema Validity Rules, item 2
from: If 2   element
to  : If two element</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18464</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Kumar Pandit">kumarp</who>
    <bug_when>2008-01-22 20:21:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>All of the changes made as suggested.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>