5390 2008-01-17 21:48:19 +0000 How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF 2009-01-08 20:01:24 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SML EPR Reference Scheme PR PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED resolved P2 normal CR 1 kirk.wilson kirk.wilson cmsmcq public-sml oldest_to_newest 18404 0 kirk.wilson 2008-01-17 21:48:19 +0000 Documents referenced through EPR reference schemes may not be embedded in SML-IF documents because of their potential dynamic character. The issue is how to handle documents that are not embedded in the SML-IF document. Specifically, should a value of a <locator> element be used and how? The issues need to be discussed in the EPR Note. 18421 1 johnarwe 2008-01-18 15:54:20 +0000 see also http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5383, which this bug was split off from, for some discussion that may be relevant. 19717 2 pratul.dublish 2008-04-02 18:38:56 +0000 Decided in F2F on 4/2 RESOLUTION: Change conformance criteria from "A set of XML documents is a conforming SML model if ..." to read "A model is a conforming SML model ..." 19718 3 pratul.dublish 2008-04-02 18:40:22 +0000 Ignore Comment #2 - it was for a different bug 20013 4 kumarp 2008-05-01 19:16:24 +0000 resolution in conf call (5/1/08): mark needsAgreement 23001 5 cmsmcq 2009-01-08 20:01:24 +0000 We discussed this issue during the call of 8 January 2009. Kirk Wilson suggested that the EPR Note should simply say that if EPR references are used in locators for non-embedded documents in an SML-IF package, then the same issues arise as when EPRs are used as a reference scheme -- that is to say, it's complicated and error prone, and those who do it need to make sure they know what they're doing. KW noted that the draft text of the EPR Note already says this. Those on the call agreed that this proposal suffices as a resolution of the issue, and that the bug should be marked as FIXED.