<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>5358</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-01-11 18:19:01 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>No errors on HTTP errors</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-04-11 07:45:00 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>mobileOK Basic checker</product>
          <component>Java Library</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sean Owen">srowen</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Abel Rionda">abel.rionda</assigned_to>
          
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18277</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sean Owen">srowen</who>
    <bug_when>2008-01-11 18:19:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>As far I can tell, we don&apos;t have any code in place currently to report
the errors described in
http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#http_response
and
http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#meta_http_equiv

Can someone confirm so?

If that&apos;s the case, this is definitely a todo item for moving to beta.

As I noted in one of my (numerous, sorry about that) other messages,
there is at least one case where an HTTP error is reported through an
individual test (GRAPHICS_FOR_SPACING); I&apos;m thinking that when we
encounter an HTTP error, we probably shouldn&apos;t run the other relevant
tests on the said resource at all.

If so, maybe we should have something in the moki document to mark up
the resources that triggered an HTTP error (as defined as a fail in
#http_response), so that we can easily avoid them in the XSLT-based
tests.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18415</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</who>
    <bug_when>2008-01-18 11:31:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Initial work checked in by Abel and Miguel.

Now needs to add test cases, associated error messages and handling in XSLT.

Also needs to fix other tests so that they don&apos;t get triggered when an HTTP error was encountered in the process.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19783</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Abel Rionda">abel.rionda</who>
    <bug_when>2008-04-11 07:45:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Added meta_http_equiv-2 (Test case MAIN_DOCUMENT 6)
Added http_response-7 (Test cases MAIN_DOCUMENT 7 and IMAGE_SPECIFY_SIZE 7)</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>