<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>5350</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-01-07 13:00:31 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[UPDUseCase] Relational tests have no schema</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-01-07 11:31:15 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>Update Facility 1.0 Use Cases</component>
          <version>Working drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Jonathan Robie">jonathan.robie</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18234</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2008-01-07 13:00:31 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>It is stated that the updates in relational use cases Q7, Q8, and Q9 are expected to fail because the document after updating would be &quot;invalid with respect to its schema&quot; (Q7), or would violate &quot;application constraints&quot; (Q8, Q9).

However, there is no schema for the source document, nor does the query contain a &quot;declare revalidation&quot; entry in the query prolog that would force the updated document to be valid.

The problem is reflected in the test cases based on these use cases, which show that the query actually succeeds.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>23630</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Robie">jonathan.robie</who>
    <bug_when>2009-02-10 18:59:08 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This has been fixed in the current internal Working Draft.

Jonathan</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>