5298 2007-11-30 16:12:32 +0000 Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' 2008-05-15 18:58:27 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SML Core+Interchange Format FPWD PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED externalComments, resolved, reviewerSatisfied P2 normal CR 1 virginia.smith virginia.smith ht pratul.dublish public-sml oldest_to_newest 17931 0 virginia.smith 2007-11-30 16:12:32 +0000 We should consider using another term for "URI scheme" since this term is also used for the scheme subcomponent in a URI. Suggestions include: SML URI scheme URI reference scheme 19332 1 kumarp 2008-03-06 20:05:46 +0000 *** Bug 5521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 19661 2 pratul.dublish 2008-03-31 21:07:58 +0000 We will use the term "SML URI Reference Scheme" - resolved in SML Call on 3/27 19688 3 pratul.dublish 2008-04-01 20:51:45 +0000 Adding to Comment #2 ------- The SML WG believes that the above proposal resolves this issue fully. I'm changing its status accordingly. The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator of this issue, to whom the following request is addressed. Please review the changes adopted and let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision. 19755 4 virginia.smith 2008-04-08 01:15:31 +0000 Fixed per comment #2. See diffs at: http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fcvsweb%2F%7Echeckout%7E%2F2007%2Fxml%2Fsml%2Fbuild%2Fsml.html%3Frev%3D1.192%26content-type%3Dtext%2Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Diso-8859-1&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fcvsweb%2F%7Echeckout%7E%2F2007%2Fxml%2Fsml%2Fbuild%2Fsml.html%3Frev%3D1.193%26content-type%3Dtext%2Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Diso-8859-1 SML-IF - section 5.3.4 only http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fcvsweb%2F%7Echeckout%7E%2F2007%2Fxml%2Fsml%2Fbuild%2Fsml-if.html%3Frev%3D1.145%26content-type%3Dtext%2Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Diso-8859-1&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fcvsweb%2F%7Echeckout%7E%2F2007%2Fxml%2Fsml%2Fbuild%2Fsml-if.html%3Frev%3D1.144%26content-type%3Dtext%2Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Diso-8859-1 19762 5 johnarwe 2008-04-10 13:07:54 +0000 App C: Note that the second element has a child element that contains an SML URI Reference Scheme referring to course MAT100 I thought we intended to use subtly different language to refer to use of a concrete instance of a ref scheme's markup vs its "abstract" definition. IIRC it was something like "instance of the XYZ Ref Scheme". In this context, we are talking about an example (instance), not the scheme def (class). 19777 6 virginia.smith 2008-04-10 19:49:52 +0000 Resolution 4/10: Fix per comment #5; mark needsReview 19854 7 kumarp 2008-04-17 18:32:14 +0000 resolution (conf call on 4/17/2008): remove the 'decided' keyword because the 2 week response period has elapsed (see comment# 3). 19879 8 ht 2008-04-18 13:39:12 +0000 I am happy with the change to "SML URI Reference Scheme" 20103 9 virginia.smith 2008-05-15 16:12:27 +0000 Fixed per comment #5. The sentence ------- Note that the second element has a child element that contains an SML URI Reference Scheme referring to course MAT100, but this reference scheme will be ignored since sml:ref="false" for the second element. -------- now reads as -------- Note that the second EnrolledCourse element contains an sml:uri element which satisfies the syntax of the SML URI Reference Scheme (referring to course MAT100) but this will be ignored since sml:ref="false" for this EnrolledCourse element. -------- 20110 10 kumarp 2008-05-15 18:58:27 +0000 resolution (5/15 conf call): resolve as fixed.