5274 2007-11-19 12:38:10 +0000 Nomenclature: defaultXPathDefaultNamespace 2008-02-08 23:24:48 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.1 only PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED terminology cluster resolved P2 minor --- 1 mike cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 17791 0 mike 2007-11-19 12:38:10 +0000 In general, defaults defined on the xs:schema element follow the convention that the default for the xxx attribute is named xxxDefault. So the default for the xpathDefaultNamespace attribute should be named xpathDefaultNamespaceDefault rather than defaultXPathDefaultNamespace. However, I think that a more usable name for the attribute would be xpathDefaultNamespace. 18549 1 David_E3 2008-01-25 16:50:32 +0000 WG agrees to change the name to xpathDefaultNamespace 18715 2 cmsmcq 2008-02-04 16:17:23 +0000 In an effort to make better use of Bugzilla, we are going to use the 'severity' field to classify issues by perceived difficulty. This bug is getting severity=minor to reflect the existing whiteboard note 'easy'. 18756 3 cmsmcq 2008-02-05 02:32:11 +0000 A wording proposal for this issue (among others) was sent to the XML Schema WG on 4 February 2008. http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.consent.200802.html (member-only link) For some issues, the proposal is effectively to make no change; see the Status section of the proposal for the specifics. 18942 4 cmsmcq 2008-02-08 23:24:48 +0000 During its telcon today, the XML Schema WG accepted the 'Structures Omnibus 2' proposal, which includes changes intended to resolve this issue. (Or, for some issues, contains the editors' proposal that the issue should be closed without further changes.) http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.consent.200801.html (member-only link) Accordingly, I'm marking the issue resolved. The originator of this issue (or in some cases the individual, acting on behalf of a group, who filed the comment) should receive an email notification of this change. Please examine the changes and let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision.