5247 2007-11-05 16:44:36 +0000 <data> without a sub-element 2007-12-13 19:38:17 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SML Interchange Format FPWD PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED resolved P2 normal LC 5047 1 sandygao kumarp public-sml oldest_to_newest 17591 0 sandygao 2007-11-05 16:44:36 +0000 The current IF schema allows <data> to not have any child element. 2 questions: - Should this be allowed (see discussion in bug 5047) - If yes, what does it mean? The IF spec needs to be clear about these 2 questions. 17665 1 pratul.dublish 2007-11-12 06:03:34 +0000 Comment #10 in 5047 has a scenario for <data> without a child element. <data> without a child element means that the document is missing from the SML IF. 17755 2 virginia.smith 2007-11-15 20:11:46 +0000 Resolution: Agreed to empty <data> element. Mark as editorial - Kumar to come back to group with proposed text. 17827 3 popescu 2007-11-21 18:14:41 +0000 Changes for this defect may be already covered under http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5272 17832 4 sandygao 2007-11-22 15:08:35 +0000 What I had in mind to resolve this bug is to add to section 5.2.1 something similar to what's in 5.2.2: If a <data> contains no child element, then the SML-IF consumer MUST treat the embedded document as if it is not part of the interchange set. 17842 5 kumarp 2007-11-26 08:13:37 +0000 I agree with the concepts expressed in comment# 3 and comment# 4. Section "5.2.1 Embedded Documents" will change substantially when we address bug# 4687 (Handling of DTDs ...). Therefore, the actual text used will need to be consistent with the language of the rest of the changes in that section. 18018 6 kumarp 2007-12-10 02:19:16 +0000 Added the following line to section 5.2.1 Embedded Documents: If model/*/document/data contains no child element or model/*/document/base64Data has empty content then the SML-IF consumer MUST treat the document as if it is not part of the interchange set.