<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>5155</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-10-08 19:15:14 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>3.3.2 XML Representation of Element Declaration Schema Components</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-10-16 18:16:04 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Structures: XSD Part 1</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>presentation cluster</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="John Arwe">johnarwe</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17075</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="John Arwe">johnarwe</who>
    <bug_when>2007-10-08 19:15:14 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The style here where divisions between different leaf cases (&quot;otherwise if the &lt;element&gt; element information item has &lt;complexType&gt; or &lt;group&gt; as an ancestor and the ref [attribute] is absent,&quot;) and multiple schema components created for a single case (&quot;An element declaration as in the first case above, with the exception&quot;) is extremely confusing to readers, as is the unintroduced forward reference to Particle schema components.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17443</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="John Arwe">johnarwe</who>
    <bug_when>2007-10-26 15:22:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This bug is from the SML workgroup as a whole, decided at 2007-10-25 telecon.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18565</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2008-01-25 20:29:03 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I rather hope this can be fixed in the course of resolving bug 5152.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>22123</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2008-10-08 16:01:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The working group discussed this issue at its 2008-10-26 telecon. The WG believes that this issue has already bee addressed as part of the proposal adopted for bug 5152.

John, if you are satisfied with this resolution, please indicate so by changing the bug&apos;s status to CLOSED.  If you&apos;re not happy, please say why and REOPEN it instead.  Thanks.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>22171</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="John Arwe">johnarwe</who>
    <bug_when>2008-10-14 20:49:17 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I personally am satisfied, however the SML wg also needs to concur since they endorsed the original in comment 1.

For posterity, in comment 3 Sandy no doubt intended to start with: 
...at its 2008-09-26 telecon.

I changed 10 to 09 above, because I can&apos;t come up with an appropriately pithy time machine -related remark at the moment.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>22186</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="John Arwe">johnarwe</who>
    <bug_when>2008-10-16 18:16:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The SML working group endorsed this resolution on its telecon of 2008-10-16.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>