<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>5134</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-10-04 18:32:21 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Digital signature and SML-IF</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-10-25 18:56:35 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>SML</product>
          <component>Interchange Format</component>
          <version>FPWD</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          <dup_id>4746</dup_id>
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="SML Working Group discussion list">public-sml</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17035</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2007-10-04 18:32:21 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>When SML model documents are included in an SML-IF document, they may have associated digital signatures, and these signatures may become invalid if the enclosed documents are altered in certain ways.

Should IF impose a requirement that, when documents are included in IF, they never need to be modified in a way not compatible with XML Canonicalization?

Or should the above be allowed, and indicate that digital signatures are (should be) generated *after* the modifications are made?

Or should IF not view this as a requirement and be silent about it?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17416</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Pratul Dublish">pratul.dublish</who>
    <bug_when>2007-10-25 18:56:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 4746 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>