<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>5076</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-09-26 00:36:35 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Comparator modification not apparent</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-02-10 01:41:40 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Structures: XSD Part 1</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>Macintosh</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xmlschema11-1-20070830/</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>typo+ cluster (need to recover details),</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Xan Gregg">xan.gregg</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16792</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Xan Gregg">xan.gregg</who>
    <bug_when>2007-09-26 00:36:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In section 3.12.6, there is the rule:

   3.12.6 Constraints on Type Alternative Schema Components

   2 If the {test} is not ·absent·, then it satisfies the constraint
      Test Value OK (§3.13.6), with the following modification:
      Comparator in Alternative XPath expressions
     [8]   Comparator   ::=   &apos;=&apos; | &apos;!=&apos; | &apos;&lt;&apos; | &apos;&lt;=&apos; | &apos;&gt;&apos; | &apos;&gt;=&apos;

However, as far as I can tell, [8] is identical to [18] in 3.13.6:

     [18]  Comparator   ::=   &apos;=&apos; | &apos;!=&apos; | &apos;&lt;&apos; | &apos;&lt;=&apos; | &apos;&gt;&apos; | &apos;&gt;=&apos;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18868</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-08 02:20:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>A wording proposal including changes for this issue went to the WG
on 7 February 2008:

  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.consent.200801.html#composition

(member-only link).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18927</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-08 23:11:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The corrections accepted by the XML Schema WG on today&apos;s call, in
order to resolve this issue, are shown in an attachment to bug 5074
(http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=517).

With this change, the WG believes we have resolved this issue fully.

I&apos;m changing the status of this record accordingly.

Xan, as the originator of this comment, you should receive from
Bugzilla an email notification of this decision.  Please accept our
thanks for the bug report.

Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by
adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the
issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please
add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG&apos;s decision
to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to
Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to
appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the
record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we
will assume you agree with the WG decision.
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18954</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Xan Gregg">xan.gregg</who>
    <bug_when>2008-02-10 01:41:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Accepted.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>