5048 2007-09-13 20:27:24 +0000 Where should sml:acyclic be specified? 2007-09-20 17:02:46 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SML Core FPWD PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED editorial P2 normal Second draft 1 sandygao popescu public-sml oldest_to_newest 16538 0 sandygao 2007-09-13 20:27:24 +0000 There are places in the spec that indicates "sml:acyclic" are specified on element declaration, but there are other places suggesting complex type definitions. Which one is correct? I think it should only be complex type definitions. Note that all examples have sml:acyclic on complex types. 16540 1 pratul.dublish 2007-09-13 22:30:21 +0000 sml:acyclic should be allowed on complex-type definitions only. Please point out the places in the spec that indicate sml:acyclic may be specified on element declarations so that we can fix them 16694 2 sandygao 2007-09-19 17:53:03 +0000 Search for "element declaration" in section "8.1.1 sml:acyclic". 16713 3 pratul.dublish 2007-09-20 16:39:45 +0000 I don't see any occurence of "element declaration" in section 8.1.1 in the latest editor's draft of SML spec 16714 4 popescu 2007-09-20 16:59:54 +0000 Pratul, I fixed this already in the second draft I'll assign the defect to me, mark it second draft, editorial and set status to fix 16715 5 popescu 2007-09-20 17:02:46 +0000 Changed sml.xsd ( comment section ) and 8.1.1 to refer to complex type as the only option for specifying sml:acyclic