4994 2007-08-29 19:43:34 +0000 Portable interpretation of "locator" 2010-04-08 17:07:52 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SML Interchange Format FPWD PC Windows XP RESOLVED WONTFIX resolved P2 normal LC 1 sandygao cmsmcq contributor public-sml oldest_to_newest 16326 0 sandygao 2007-08-29 19:43:34 +0000 Section 3.3.2 says: "If a document is to be referred to rather than embedded, a reference to it MUST placed in the locator child of the corresponding document element. SML-IF specifies one way such references may be constructed, the documentURI element, however any representation on which the producer and consumer agree may be used. [Ed. note: the previous statement is not very portable!]" Note the "Ed. note". SML-IF needs to answer whether portable behavior is desired/required. Also note that "be" is missing between "MUST" and "placed in". 17299 1 virginia.smith 2007-10-17 20:50:10 +0000 Michael to bring a proposal. 17684 2 pratul.dublish 2007-11-12 20:40:24 +0000 Given that a consumer is not required to resolve the locator element (i.e. attempt to retrieve the doc referenced by locator, a portable interprtation of locator does not appear to be imortant for the SML IF spec. Recommend resolving this as WON'T FIX 17710 3 kumarp 2007-11-14 06:58:35 +0000 This is now in section "5.2.2 Referenced Documents". I agree with the recommendation in comment# 2. 17738 4 johnarwe 2007-11-15 17:24:44 +0000 I don't see a 5.2.2, or a "referenced documents" heading, in either editor's copy (just searched both). It appears to be in 3.2 now. 17745 5 virginia.smith 2007-11-15 18:21:12 +0000 This section is still 5.2.2. This bug overlaps with bug #5248 (sigh!) and the section title is now to 5.2.2 Referenced Documents. 34662 6 Ms2ger 2010-04-08 17:07:52 +0000 *** Bug 9450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***