<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4886</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-07-27 16:15:28 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>proposal for alternative language for defining derived datatypes</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-09-27 15:46:58 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Datatypes: XSD Part 2</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>LATER</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Dave Peterson">davep</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>15945</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Peterson">davep</who>
    <bug_when>2007-07-27 16:15:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>in

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2007AprJun/0043.html

Michael Hedenus (&lt;Michael.Hedenus.ext@siemensvdo.com) proposes an alternative language based on URIs for datatypes to defined some (possibly all?) derived datatypes.  I cannot find any indication that this has been acted on by the WG, which needs to do so.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16178</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="David Ezell">David_E3</who>
    <bug_when>2007-08-17 16:04:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>2007-08-17 telcon
&lt;ht&gt; MSM: We should say we accept the goal, and think the proposed mechanism is ingenious, but isn&apos;t complete (unions, complex types) and doesn&apos;t offer enough benefits over SCDs to be proposed right now

The WG thinks that this is an ingenious solution, but declines to make the change to this version of datatypes. </thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16851</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Peterson">davep</who>
    <bug_when>2007-09-27 15:46:58 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>A message to the original contributor was sent 27 Sep.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2007JulSep/0197.html</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>