4854 2007-07-13 01:37:46 +0000 [Guidelines] Fictitious, why not real examples? 2007-07-17 10:27:55 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Policy Guidelines FPWD PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 asirveda fsasaki public-ws-policy-qa oldest_to_newest 15802 0 asirveda 2007-07-13 01:37:46 +0000 Title: [Guidelines] Fictitious, why not real examples? Description: Section 5.6.1 [1] uses fictitious examples such as: /samplePrefix:SampleAssertion/@any Why not use a real assertion? Say, WS-Addressing Policy Assertions [2] or WS Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion [3]. Justification: Should consider using real assertions, when available. Proposal: Use Ws-Addressing policy assertions or WS Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion. [1] http://tinyurl.com/2hm9cc#d3e783 [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata/ws-addr-metadata.xsd [3] http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-spec-os-01.html#_Toc160540908 15830 1 chrisfer 2007-07-17 10:27:55 +0000 RESOLUTION: issue 4854 closed with /wsrmp:RMAssertion/@{any} instead of /samplePrefix:SampleAssertion/@any See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-ws-policy-irc#T10-27-13 Note, references to be updated by editors