4801 2007-06-27 23:06:24 +0000 Think about making wording of bullet point 3 (if an SML identity constraint is specified for an element dec. E, then this constraint is applicable...) to be more crisp about the scope 2007-10-19 21:44:24 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SML Core unspecified PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED P1 normal --- 1 bassamt kumarp public-sml oldest_to_newest 15682 0 bassamt 2007-06-27 23:06:24 +0000 16159 1 cmsmcq 2007-08-16 19:02:14 +0000 For the record: the bullet point in question is the one on identity constraints (3.4 in 6 August draft): http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2007/xml/sml/build/sml.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Identity_Constraints 17256 2 virginia.smith 2007-10-16 23:02:10 +0000 Resolution: - remove this bullet point - bullet point 3 in section 4.4 - add same wording of this bullet point to the conformance section (section 7) - section reference should be 3.11 NOT 3.11.2 in paragraph above bullet points 17293 3 virginia.smith 2007-10-17 19:59:43 +0000 Applies to all of 4.3 not just 4.3.1. Note that Section 4.3.1 will be rewritten anyway based on cycle proposal. 17294 4 virginia.smith 2007-10-17 20:00:24 +0000 Disregard previous note - wrong bug. 17324 5 kumarp 2007-10-19 21:44:24 +0000 fixed. The line added to the conformance section was added such that it is consistent with the wording of the other conformance criteria.