4755 2007-06-24 17:46:23 +0000 SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not covered 2007-11-18 07:16:14 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SML Interchange Format unspecified PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal LC 1 johnarwe kumarp public-sml oldest_to_newest 15583 0 johnarwe 2007-06-24 17:46:23 +0000 context: If the URI representing a resolved inter-document reference has a fragment, the reference is to the element obtained by applying the fragment to the referred-to document starting with its root element. Since SMLIF does not require that the model being exchanged is a valid SML model, a fragment may resolve to any of the following: 0 elements 1 element >1 element Existing text assumes only 1 element is possible. Need to cover other cases. Other cases cannot occur if the SMLIF document is also a valid SML model, but 3.2 explicitly says SMLIF does not require the interchange set to form a valid SML model. 17286 1 virginia.smith 2007-10-17 17:42:10 +0000 Section is now 3.4.6. 17702 2 kumarp 2007-11-13 18:51:08 +0000 Proposal: Change the text, from: ...has a fragment, the reference is to the element obtained by ... to : ...has a fragment, the reference is to the set of elements obtained by ... 17734 3 johnarwe 2007-11-15 17:07:57 +0000 fine with me 17751 4 virginia.smith 2007-11-15 19:18:09 +0000 Resolution: Removing dependency and accepting proposal as in comment #2. 17789 5 kumarp 2007-11-18 07:16:14 +0000 fixed as proposed.