<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4736</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-06-23 13:19:50 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Make RDF available through WSDL-related URIs</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-06-23 13:19:50 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WSDL</product>
          <component>RDF Mapping</component>
          <version>2.0</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>NEW</bug_status>
          <resolution></resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0044.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Jonathan Marsh">jonathan</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Philippe Le Hegaret">plh</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="WSDL Mailing List">www-ws-desc</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>15564</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Marsh">jonathan</who>
    <bug_when>2007-06-23 13:19:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hi all,
we still have an open issue 289 in the original issues list [1] about
providing RDF representations of our various namespaces, with excerpts
from the ontology defined in the RDF mapping. BTW, this may wait until
after PR, I expect.

The URIs used in the RDF mapping are now summarized there in App B [2].
The ontology (wsdl20.rdf) should live at http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-rdf
We may consider putting RDF or RDDL at the following other URIs, too:

MessageExchangePatterns and their labels:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-only
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-opt-out
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-in
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-only
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-opt-in
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-in-only
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-out-only

SafeInteraction class:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions

OperationStyles:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/multipart
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/rpc

Signature extension:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/rpc

The bindings:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap

Is there an in-house style for adding RDF to pre-existing namespaces?</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>