<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4733</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-06-23 10:16:57 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[FT] editorial: E XML Syntax (XQueryX) for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-08-12 10:03:04 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>Full Text 1.0</component>
          <version>Last Call drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Dyck">jmdyck</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Jim Melton">jim.melton</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>15561</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Dyck">jmdyck</who>
    <bug_when>2007-06-23 10:16:57 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>E XML Syntax (XQueryX) for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0

[1]
&quot;Because XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0 integrates seamlessly with
XQuery 1.0&quot;
    I would say there&apos;s a visible seam where the two join.
    Delete &quot;seamlessly&quot;.

[2]
&apos;([XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text Requirements], section 4.3,
Composability, states that &quot;XQuery/XPath Full-Text MUST be composable with
XQuery, and SHOULD be composable with itself.&quot;)&apos;
    This is kind of clunky for a parenthetical remark. Delete it, I think.

[3]
&quot;it follows that the XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0
must integrate seamlessly with the XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0.&quot;
    This sentence is saying something like &quot;because this spec satisfies
    requirement X, it therefore satisfies requirement Y&quot;. Is it the spec&apos;s
    job to point out how it comes to satisfy its requirements?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16126</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Jim Melton">jim.melton</who>
    <bug_when>2007-08-12 02:08:59 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The editor responsible for Appendix E has applied the two suggestions found in your items 1 and 2.  That editor believes that no changes are needed in response to your item 3.  We have marked this bug FIXED (even though item 3 resulted in no changes to the document).  If you are satisfied with this action, please mark the bug CLOSED. </thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>