4703 2007-06-23 09:59:33 +0000 [FT] editorial: 3 Full-Text Selections 2007-10-26 22:27:49 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT Full Text 1.0 Last Call drafts All All CLOSED FIXED P2 minor --- 1 jmdyck doerre public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 15531 0 jmdyck 2007-06-23 09:59:33 +0000 3 Full-Text Selections [1] "In the following the syntax" After "following", insert comma. [2] "A full-text selection specifies the possible full-text search conditions" Why just the "possible" conditions? 16437 1 doerre 2007-09-10 19:41:36 +0000 [1]: done [2]: left as is. Would you prefer "alternatives". Isn't that the "possibilities"? Best, /Jochen 16444 2 jmdyck 2007-09-10 21:18:24 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > > [2]: left as is. > Would you prefer "alternatives". You mean, "A full-text selection specifies the alternative full-text search conditions" ? I don't think that's an improvement. To me, including the word "possible" suggests a distinction from "actual" (where the actual is a subset of the possible), which I don't think is the intent. If we just deleted "possible": "A full-text selection specifies the full-text search conditions" wouldn't that convey the right idea? 17142 3 doerre 2007-10-11 14:50:03 +0000 Hi Michael, this bug can be closed. The spec now contains the wording (as agreed upon in FTTF-153 telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-query-fttf/2007Sep/0013.html) A full-text selection specifies the conditions of a full-text search.