4694 2007-06-22 09:36:25 +0000 [XQX] <forLetClauseItemExtensions> element not documented 2007-08-20 09:47:53 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XQueryX 1.0 Recommendation All All CLOSED INVALID P2 normal --- 1 oliver jim.melton public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 15521 0 oliver 2007-06-22 09:36:25 +0000 The element <forLetClauseItemExtensions> is defined in the XQueryX schema as follows: <!-- Represents all variable bindings in a for or let clause except typed and positional variable bindings --> <xsd:element name="forLetClauseItemExtensions" abstract="true"/> Beyond the comment there is no documentation for this element at all. It is used in the schema in both the forClauseItem type and letClauseItem element, although it is an abstract element with no substitution groups defined. None of the XQTS cases use this element either. 15522 1 oliver 2007-06-22 10:31:28 +0000 It turns out that the schema in the specification (at http://www.w3.org/TR/xqueryx/) is wrong - this has been fixed in the schema found at http://www.w3.org/2005/XQueryX/xqueryx.xsd 16144 2 jim.melton 2007-08-14 15:47:14 +0000 Actually, the schema in the XQueryX Recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/xqueryx/) is the correct schema; for reasons we have not been able to explain to ourselves, the schema document at http://www.w3.org/2005/XQueryX/xqueryx.xsd is an obsolete schema document left over from an earlier Working Draft. We will correct that error shortly. The reason for the "undocumented" abstract type has to do with providing a mechanism for defining extensions to XQueryX in other documents under development (e.g., Full-Text and the Update Facility). Therefore, it is not a "bug", but a deliberate feature. As such, I am marking this bug resolved (INVALID) and ask that you mark it CLOSED at your earliest opportunity.