4688 2007-06-21 17:51:56 +0000 Consider using xml:base 2007-09-14 20:04:43 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SML Interchange Format unspecified PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED editorial P2 normal Second draft 5181 1 sandygao popescu public-sml oldest_to_newest 15512 0 sandygao 2007-06-21 17:51:56 +0000 The interchange format currently defines a <baseURI>, which is used to resolve relative URIs in the IF document. xml:base attribute was introduced for the same/similar purpose. SML should consider whether it's possible to use xml:base. 16390 1 pratul.dublish 2007-09-05 23:10:09 +0000 It is possible to use xml:base instead of <baseURI> but the WG should consider the following issues: 1. <baseURI> allows attribute extensions, and this will be lost if xml:base is used 2. The xml:base spec uses the definition of URI from RFC 2396 but the definition of xs:anyURI in XML Schema 1.0 uses RFC 2396 as amended by RFC 2732 3. xml:base does not support IRIs, so there is an impact on bug 4632 16532 2 johnarwe 2007-09-13 18:45:32 +0000 Consensus 2007-09-13 telecon: change to xml:base, remove smlif:baseURI 16604 3 popescu 2007-09-14 20:04:43 +0000 fix in CVS