4684 2007-06-21 17:26:58 +0000 Can sml:keyref refer to an xs:key/unique? 2007-10-16 20:56:12 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified SML Core unspecified PC Windows XP RESOLVED WONTFIX P1 normal LC 4995 5130 1 sandygao kirk.wilson public-sml oldest_to_newest 15505 0 sandygao 2007-06-21 17:26:58 +0000 For example, is the following allowed? Or should sml:keyref only be able to refer to sml:key/unique? <xs:element name="e" type="t"> <xs:annotation> <xs:appinfo> <sml:keyref name="myRef refer="tns:myKey"> ... </sml:keyref> </xs:appinfo> </xs:annotation> <xs:key name="myKey"> ... </xs:key> </xs:element> 16302 1 popescu 2007-08-28 13:48:15 +0000 A good scenario for reusing xs:key/unique is in legacy documents; you may want to reuse an existing schema key/unique and refer to it from another document using the sml:keyref element 16303 2 popescu 2007-08-28 14:50:17 +0000 there are too many unknowns about this one; move target to LC 16493 3 kirk.wilson 2007-09-12 12:37:55 +0000 Recommendation has been proposed to add an optional scope attribute to sml:keyref that implicit contains a deref() and refers to the element in which the xs:key/xs:unique is defined. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2007Sep/0077.html for complete proposal 17032 4 kirk.wilson 2007-10-04 17:22:51 +0000 Or does the resolution of 5130 depend on how we choose to resolve this issue? 17159 5 kirk.wilson 2007-10-12 14:59:00 +0000 Revised proposal for discussion at second Redmond F2F http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2007Oct/0083.html 17244 6 kumarp 2007-10-16 20:46:21 +0000 decision at redmond f2f: We decided to keep SML and XSD id constratints separate. Bug 5130 will marked editorial so that this can be clarified in the spec.