4681 2007-06-21 04:09:01 +0000 Microsoft Errata10 test errF001 2010-03-26 15:37:18 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Test Suite Microsoft tests 2006-11-06 PC Windows 2000 NEW disputedTest P2 normal --- 1 mrglavas ht David_E3 public-xml-schema-testsuite oldest_to_newest 15494 0 mrglavas 2007-06-21 04:09:01 +0000 The schema for the Microsoft Errata10 test (group="errF001";name="errF001") is described as valid in the metadata. I think that this schema is actually invalid. E2-35 [1] (the erratum this test is trying to test) was superseded by E2-66 [2] before XML Schema 1.0 2nd edition was released. Due to E2-66 the spec [3] now says: "If length is a member of {facets} then it is an error for maxLength to be a member of {facets} unless there is a type definition from which this one is derived by one or more restriction steps in which maxLength has the same {value} and length is not specified." I believe the simple type "st2" defined in errF001.xsd doesn't satisfy this condition because the base type definition doesn't have a maxLength facet. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-35 [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-66 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#length-coss