4669 2007-06-20 07:08:29 +0000 [Full text LC draft sec. 3.3.4] Interoperability of thesaurus option 2008-02-12 00:53:44 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT Full Text 1.0 Last Call drafts PC Windows XP CLOSED WONTFIX P2 normal --- 1 fsasaki pcase public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 15475 0 fsasaki 2007-06-20 07:08:29 +0000 You write: "The set of relationships supported by an implementation is implementation-defined, but implementations SHOULD support the relationships defined in [ISO 2788]." To assure interoperability between thesaurus option, I wonder if SHOULD should be a MUST. 15969 1 pcase 2007-07-30 16:50:47 +0000 There are existing implementations whose thesaurus support does not conform to ISO 2788. In order to encourage implementations to support this specification sooner rather than later, we should not make the job not difficult to achieve. However, future version of this spec may choose to tighten the requirements, changing SHOULD to MUST. If you accept this explanation, please close the bug. 18966 2 fsasaki 2008-02-12 00:53:44 +0000 Apologies for late reply, I did not see the comment at http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4669#c1 I'm fine with this bug being closed. Felix