46 2002-10-27 09:08:43 +0000 "would validate" too hard to spot. 2013-03-26 10:11:28 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Validator check 0.6.0b2 Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.lavacochesnely.es/ P2 normal --- 4 1 link link lavacochesnely oldest_to_newest 77 0 link 2002-10-27 09:08:44 +0000 Reported by Björn Höhrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>: I tried to validate http://www.websitedev.de/xhtml/xhtml1/ as ISO-8859-1 encoded XHTML 1.0 Transitional document. The validator responds * DOCTYPE Override in effect! Any DOCTYPE Declaration in the document has been suppressed and the DOCTYPE for «XHTML 1.0 Transitional» inserted instead. The document will not be Valid until you alter the source file to reflect this new DOCTYPE. The document located at <URL:http://www.websitedev.de/xhtml/xhtml1/> would validate as XHTML 1.0 Strict if you updated it to match the Options used. [...] The "would validate" note is very well hidden after the super obtrusive "Tip of the day" and the "doctype override" note. The result is the most important information on the page, but you have hard times to find it at all. 81 1 link 2002-10-27 09:35:40 +0000 Restored the "Valid" heading with an added "Tentative" note and elaborate on the reason for the tentative status in the body text.