4506 2007-04-27 19:33:39 +0000 accepting xop+xml but not sending it 2007-07-11 19:24:53 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XMLP WG mtom policy assertion unspecified All Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2007Apr/0011.html P3 normal --- 1 jonathan chrisfer chrisfer oldest_to_newest 14918 0 jonathan 2007-04-27 19:33:39 +0000 11) In the case where MTOM assertion is included in the WSDL endpoint with wsp:Optional='true' and the client of a req-res operation does not use application/xop+xml media-type and wants to indicate that the service can send application/xop+xml media-type (bug 4341): how about saying something along the lines of -- This spec does not define how to convey which policy alternative is selected or which feature is supported. Specific protocols may have an ability to convey such information. For example, Accept HTTP header may be used by the HTTP client to convey which media-types are acceptable for the response. 15485 1 chrisfer 2007-06-20 19:27:42 +0000 When an endpoint reflects a compact policy expression with the MTOM assertion marked with wsp:Optional='true', it may be difficult to know which alternative has been engaged. In such cases, if a request message is received that is an application/soap+xml message, then the receiving endpoint SHOULD respond (if at all) with an application/soap+xml response message unless there is some other indicator that specifies that the response is to be sent using MTOM encoding. To ensure that a response message is serialized as application/xop+xml a client can send an application/xop+xml request message. RESOLUTION: Issue 4506 is closed with the text above to the optional=true defintion See http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-xmlprotocol-irc#T19-26-25 15657 2 chrisfer 2007-06-27 19:36:05 +0000 "For example, when using SOAP/HTTP binding, the 'Accept' HTTP header value of 'application/xop+xml' in the request message indicates that the response may be sent using MTOM encoding." RESOLUTION: add anish's proposed addendum to the resolution to See http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-xmlprotocol-irc#T19-35-33 15790 3 chrisfer 2007-07-11 19:24:53 +0000 RESOLUTION: amend resolution to 4506 with proposal from Pete in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2007Jul/0002.html See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-xmlprotocol-irc#T19-24-35