<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4492</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-04-25 17:13:53 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Canonical fragments and targetNamespace</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-04-26 15:35:18 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WSDL</product>
          <component>Core</component>
          <version>2.0</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Apr/0052.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Jonathan Marsh">jonathan</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Philippe Le Hegaret">plh</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="WSDL Mailing List">www-ws-desc</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14891</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Marsh">jonathan</who>
    <bug_when>2007-04-25 17:13:53 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m also implementing the creation of the fragment identifiers and I found the following small (maybe editorial) problems in Appendix C:

1) the canonical form does not say that no xmlns() pointer part should define the namespace same as the namespace of the WSDL 2.0 document, so it doesn&apos;t seem that the following would be uncanonical, while it should be:

http://example.com/wsdl#
    xmlns(ns1=http://example.com/wsdl#)
    wsdl.interfaceFaultReference(iface/op/In/ns1:Foo)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14896</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Marsh">jonathan</who>
    <bug_when>2007-04-26 15:33:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Add the constraint: &quot;No xmlns() pointer part defines a namespace for the targetNamespace of the WSDL 2.0 document.&quot;</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>