4473 2007-04-19 07:08:40 +0000 "Validating CSS, linking to this result" is confusing 2007-05-07 14:56:30 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Validator Templates 0.8.0b1 PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdorward.me.uk%2Fwww%2Fcentre%2F&charset=&doctype=&outline=1&group=0 P2 normal --- 1 david ot www-validator-cvs oldest_to_newest 14749 0 david 2007-04-19 07:08:40 +0000 The results page has a subsection entitled "Validating CSS, linking to this result". Would this be better as two subsections? "Linking to this result" and "Validating CSS". The two parts have less in common with each other then "Linking to this result" has to the preceding section about icons. 14756 1 ot 2007-04-19 10:57:10 +0000 Good idea. 14757 2 david 2007-04-19 11:02:11 +0000 For that matter, could the URL for the "linking to this result" section be merged into the icon code? Perhaps as an alternative with a comment about the unreliability of referer headers? 14758 3 ot 2007-04-19 11:08:11 +0000 (In reply to comment #0) > Would this be better as two subsections? "Linking to this result" and > "Validating CSS". Done in CVS: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/validator/share/templates/en_US/valid.tmpl.diff?r1=1.20&r2=1.21&f=h (I also softened the wording "should check" -> "can check" because I find the former a little aggressive) 15030 4 ot 2007-05-07 14:56:30 +0000 Hi David, (In reply to comment #2) > For that matter, could the URL for the "linking to this result" section be > merged into the icon code? Well, there is more to linking than the icon, so maybe a separate section is not a bad thing. > Perhaps as an alternative with a comment about the > unreliability of referer headers? I think we should pass on this for now, because I don't want advocates of crippling referer headers to take this as and endorsement by w3c. I am moving this bug to resolved-fixed, but feel free to reopen if you think it should be revisited. Thanks David.