<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4431</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-03-29 17:29:43 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Definnition of equivalent value.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-04-26 13:01:49 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WSDL</product>
          <component>Core</component>
          <version>2.0</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2007Mar/0009</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Jonathan Marsh">jonathan</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Arthur Ryman">ryman</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="WSDL Mailing List">www-ws-desc</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14595</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Marsh">jonathan</who>
    <bug_when>2007-03-29 17:29:43 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>[[
2.15 Equivalence of Components

Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for each property of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an equivalent value on the second component, and vice versa.

Instances of properties of the same type are considered equivalent if their values are equivalent.
]]

Re &quot;property with an equivalent value&quot;, Should this not point instead to the rule in the next sentence?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14728</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Arthur Ryman">ryman</who>
    <bug_when>2007-04-15 21:44:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Here is my proposed edit:

Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for each property of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an equivalent value, as defined in the following sentence, on the second component, and vice versa.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14771</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Marsh">jonathan</who>
    <bug_when>2007-04-19 15:29:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>&quot;Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for
each property value of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an equivalent value on the second component, and vice versa.&quot;
</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>