4421 2007-03-29 16:58:27 +0000 Editorial Issues - Part 1 2007-04-26 13:00:39 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WSDL Core 2.0 All All CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Mar/0057 resolved P2 minor --- 1 jonathan plh www-ws-desc oldest_to_newest 14581 0 jonathan 2007-03-29 16:58:27 +0000 Please find the following editorial issues that I find in Part 1. 1) Why is 1.1 titled "Web Service" ? It does not describe what a Web Service is. It describes in summary on how WSDL describes a Web Service. Perhaps it should be titled "Service Description" or something on those lines . 2) 1.4.5 --> Inlined Schema statement - "An XML schema that is defined in the xs:types element information item of a WSDL 2.0 description." suggestion - It should be "wsdl:types" and not "xs:types". 3) Section 2.1.1 Statement in the spec :- "At the abstract level, the Description component is just a container for two categories of components: WSDL 2.0 components and type system components.WSDL 2.0 components are interfaces, bindings and services. ". Suggestion :- This gives a message that bindings and services exist at the abstract level. Is it true ? Moreover, the first sentence seems to suggest that the later part of the section will go and quote the Description component at the concrete level - which is missing . 14585 1 jonathan 2007-03-29 17:07:18 +0000 Per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Mar/att-0083/20070329-ws-desc-minutes.html#item06, we will: - Rename 1.1 to "Service Description" - Fix the incorrect prefix as proposed. - Change "At the abstract level" to "At a high level"