4419 2007-03-28 19:40:51 +0000 specify the static and dynamic context for XPath evaluation 2008-03-08 15:43:43 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.1 only Macintosh All CLOSED FIXED resolved P2 normal --- 1 cmsmcq cmsmcq mike noah_mendelsohn www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 14568 0 cmsmcq 2007-03-28 19:40:51 +0000 Each place where the Schema spec invokes XPath evaluation, it needs to specify what goes into the static context. Fuller details are given by Mike Kay at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2007Mar/0109.html (member-only link). N.B. this includes specifying the namespace bindings in force for the evaluation, which means this issue subsumes that raised in bug 4303. 14571 1 cmsmcq 2007-03-28 19:42:43 +0000 *** Bug 4303 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 14573 2 mike 2007-03-28 20:16:36 +0000 >specify what goes into the static context and the dynamic context, too. 15269 3 cmsmcq 2007-06-01 16:11:14 +0000 The requirement is to specify the entire context, not just the static context. Accordingly, I'm changingthe summary of the issue. 16014 4 cmsmcq 2007-08-02 00:30:00 +0000 The WG reached consensus, in a series of calls in May and June 2007, on rules for evaluating XPath expressions in the context of schema-validity assessment, including both specification of how to type the XDM instance or leave it untyped (bug 4416) and specification of the static and dynamic contexts (bug 4419). A wording proposal reflecting that consensus is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b4419.200707.html (member-only link). Accordingly, I'm changing the status of this issue to needsReview. 16051 5 cmsmcq 2007-08-03 18:52:42 +0000 The wording proposal mentioned in comment #3 was discussed and adopted by the WG during our call of 3 August 2007. With that decision, this issue has been successfully resolved, and I am setting its status accordingly.