<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4405</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-03-21 18:25:41 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>questionable statement regarding receiving node</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-03-21 20:17:14 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XMLP WG</product>
          <component>one way mep</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2007Feb/0000.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>4406</blocked>
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Christopher Ferris">chrisfer</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Christopher Ferris">chrisfer</assigned_to>
          <cc>jonathan</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Christopher Ferris">chrisfer</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14502</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Christopher Ferris">chrisfer</who>
    <bug_when>2007-03-21 18:25:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>5. &quot;A receiving node MUST determine whether a given message is 
successfully received&quot;: this is likely outside the scope of SOAP. The 
SOAP &apos;middleware&apos; may not even be able to detect the message was not 
successfully received. Suggestion: &quot;When a message is successfully 
received by a SOAP node, the node MUST populate etc.&quot;.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14512</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Christopher Ferris">chrisfer</who>
    <bug_when>2007-03-21 18:42:54 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>See minutes: http://www.w3.org/2007/03/07-xmlprotocol-minutes.html

ACTION: Chris to provide replacement text for 3rd paragraph in section 2.2 [recorded in  http://www.w3.org/2007/03/07-xmlprotocol-minutes.html#action05]</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14519</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Christopher Ferris">chrisfer</who>
    <bug_when>2007-03-21 20:17:14 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext> RESOLUTION: WSDL #5 closed with the following replacement text for 3rd para sect 2.2: When a message is successfully received by a SOAP node, that node MUST  
 populate 
 http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage with the received  
 message and  
 MUST process the message in  
 http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage  
 according to the SOAP Processing Model (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] 
 Processing SOAP messages).  
 A receiver  
 might, in exceptional circumstances, treat as erroneous, or lost, a  
 message that has been received intact.  
 Typical reasons for making such decisions might include shortage of buffer  
 space, network interface overruns, etc..  
 A receiver MAY fault in a binding-specific manner if some particular  
 message is determined to have been  
 unsuccessfully received (note, however, that in many cases where receipt  
 is unsuccessful, information  
 identifying the message or its sender may be unreliable, in which case  
 there may be little if any value  
 in reflecting a message-specific fault.) 

See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-xmlprotocol-irc#T19-34-29</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>