<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4362</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-03-02 15:24:47 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Property opacity doesn&apos;t exist : 0.5</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-03-28 17:57:38 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>CSSValidator</product>
          <component>CSS 3</component>
          <version>CSS Validator</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WORKSFORME</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#transparency</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sean Robertson">seanr</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Terje Bless">link</assigned_to>
          <cc>info</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="qa-dev tracking">www-validator-cvs</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14299</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sean Robertson">seanr</who>
    <bug_when>2007-03-02 15:24:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Validator incorrectly reports that opacity does not exist, but it is listed here in the specs:

http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#transparency

This causes sites to fail validation even though their code is fully compliant - a problem for any designer who prides him or herself on standards compliance (one of my sites was listed among the 35 best built political sites out of 1000 tested by CNET for that very reason).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16343</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Gérard Talbot">info</who>
    <bug_when>2007-09-01 04:08:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hello all,

opacity is a CSS 3 (color module) property. When submitting a webpage to CSS validator, the default profile is CSS 2.1 and not CSS 3 profile.

Demonstration that opacity is correctly reported as valid property name when submitted to W3C CSS validator (with a CSS 3 profile):

http://www.gtalbot.org/BugzillaSection/TestingOpacityCSSValidation.html

In my opinion, this bug is 

INVALID</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19641</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Olivier Thereaux">ot</who>
    <bug_when>2008-03-28 17:57:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Indeed opacity is not in the default CSS2.1, but setting the validator to check against css3 works. The validator now gives a more user-friendly message when using css2.1:
Property opacity doesn&apos;t exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in [css3]

I&apos;m closing this as WORKSFORME</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>