4263 2007-01-18 22:19:50 +0000 [Primer] Add text to ignorable discussion on passing ignorable property of assertion to domain specific processing 2007-03-13 22:34:19 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Policy Primer FPWD Macintosh All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 w3c fsasaki public-ws-policy-qa oldest_to_newest 13700 0 w3c 2007-01-18 22:19:50 +0000 The new text added to primer on ignorable (as in issue 4041 and noted in resolution http://www.w3.org/2007/01/18-ws-policy-irc#T22-08-44-1) should include explanation that domain specific processing should be aware of ignorable marking of assertion. (Thread about proposal for 4041 at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0187.html ) Proposal: Add following text proposed to be added at end of new section 3.4.1 Strict and Lax Policy Intersection "Domain specific processing should be made aware of whether assertions it is processing were marked as ignorable since that may impact domain specific processing." [Note that this proposal is different from the following text which was removed from the original proposal for 4041 "When domain specific processing is to be performed in strict mode, it is up to that domain specific processing to interpret the Ignorable rattribute. In lax mode it is not relevant since ignorable assertions are not passed to the domain specific processing step of the intersection algorithm."] 14409 1 chrisfer 2007-03-13 22:34:19 +0000 [18:31] cferris: Proposal: Add following text proposed to be added at end of new section 3.4.1 Strict and Lax Policy Intersection: [18:32] cferris: 'Domain-specific processing could take advantage of any information from the policy data model, such as the ignorable property of a policy assertion'. [18:32] dmoberg: cferris: Any objections? None voiced [18:33] cferris: RESOLUTION: close 4263 with proposal above [18:33] cferris: rrsagent, where am i? [18:33] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/13-ws-policy-irc#T22-33-55