4211 2007-01-12 23:58:15 +0000 WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment 2007-01-16 21:43:49 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Policy Attachment LC All All RESOLVED FIXED P2 minor --- 1 jonathan fsasaki public-ws-policy-qa oldest_to_newest 13514 0 jonathan 2007-01-12 23:58:15 +0000 8. Effective Policy (3.1) - The second paragraph is very cumbersome. The first phrase in the first sentence should be broken out into its own sentence, to read, "When multiple attachments are made, their relevant policies can be combined." - The third paragraph has the same problem. The first phrase in the first sentence should be broken out into its own sentence, to read, "This combination can be achieved through a merge." 9. XML Element Attachment (3.3) - Element Information Item should reference its definition in XML Infoset [3]. 10. Security Considerations (7) - Policy attachments "signing" is RECOMMENDED but there is no reference to what is indicated by "signing" or to any standards work (W3C or other) around any such signing. Does this refer to WSS signatures [6]? The use of "signing" itself in this language should reference any such standard(s). [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204/#infoitem.document [6] http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0.pdf 13617 1 cbarreto 2007-01-16 21:43:49 +0000 Resolved WSDL WG LC comments as per: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0153.html