<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4136</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-01-02 18:22:30 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Microsoft &quot;schema&quot; test set, schU3 (duplicate definitions)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2010-07-05 15:42:38 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema Test Suite</product>
          <component>Microsoft tests</component>
          <version>2006-11-06</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>Metadata updated 2010-07-05</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</assigned_to>
          <cc>David_E3</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema Test Suite mailing list">public-xml-schema-testsuite</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13326</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2007-01-02 18:22:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Test schU3 consists of a set of five schema documents with complex include/import/redefine relationships. According to the metadata it is valid. I believe that it is invalid.

Module b includes module d without redefining it. This acquires a definition of attribute group c-g1. Module b also redefines module c, acquiring another definition of attribute group c-g1. I think there are therefore two conflicting definitions of this attribute group, and the schema should be rejected as invalid for this reason.

(There are other conflicts as well, over complex type c-ct and element declaration c-e1).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13327</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2007-01-02 18:23:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The same arguments apply to schU4 and schU5</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13896</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Zafar Abbas">zafara</who>
    <bug_when>2007-02-02 19:38:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Agreed that this test should not be published as a compliance test. We are
following up with the WG to determine the process of updating the test suite.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>