<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4132</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-01-02 16:10:41 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Microsoft &quot;schema&quot; test set, schD8</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2010-07-05 14:59:32 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema Test Suite</product>
          <component>Microsoft tests</component>
          <version>2006-11-06</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>Test revised and metadata updated 2010-07-05</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</assigned_to>
          <cc>David_E3</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema Test Suite mailing list">public-xml-schema-testsuite</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13318</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2007-01-02 16:10:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In the Microsoft &quot;schema&quot; test set, 

   &lt;test group=&quot;schD8&quot; name=&quot;schD8&quot;/&gt;

the schema contains

	&lt;include schemaLocation=&quot;file://&quot;/&gt;

The schema is described as valid, on the basis that failure to resolve the schemaLocation is not intrinsically an error.

However, I believe that file:// is an invalid xs:anyURI value, and that this schema therefore violates the schema-for-schemas. The clause saying that failure to resolve the URI is not an error does not license the use of an invalid URI.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13894</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Zafar Abbas">zafara</who>
    <bug_when>2007-02-02 19:30:59 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Agreed that this test outcome should be invalid. We are following up with the WG to determine the process of updating the test suite.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>31275</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</who>
    <bug_when>2010-01-27 11:17:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m not sure whether this test makes sense, given that URI-checking is not 
required. . .  I would argue we should remove the test, not change the outcome 
to invalid</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>31342</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</who>
    <bug_when>2010-01-29 15:44:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Actually, another case for the mooted &apos;implDep&apos; marking</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>35801</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="David Ezell">David_E3</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-21 17:05:02 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>WG decided that the existing URI is invalid, and that we replace it with a valid URI that doesn&apos;t resolve.  As such, this test would be valid for either 1.0 or 1.1.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>