<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4130</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-01-02 14:27:18 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Ignorable assertions must be ignored</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-01-10 19:01:57 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WS-Policy</product>
          <component>Framework</component>
          <version>LC</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Ashok Malhotra">ashok.malhotra</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Web Services Policy WG QA List">public-ws-policy-qa</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13316</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Ashok Malhotra">ashok.malhotra</who>
    <bug_when>2007-01-02 14:27:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>At the last f2f meeting the WS-Policy WG agreed to add an attribute called &apos;ignorable&apos; to the WS-Policy assertion syntax.  We think this is a step in the right direction.  The WG, however, blunted the effect of this change by allowing the ignorable attribute to be ignored during policy intersection by allowing two intersection modes one of which honors the ignorable attribute and the other which ignores it.

We argue this creates a problem as the parties attempting to agree on a policy alternative may use different forms of the intersection algorithm and come up with different solutions.  A standard that allows such variation is not very useful.

We suggest that the policy intersection algorithm be changed so that assertions marked ignorable are always ignored.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13421</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Christopher Ferris">chrisfer</who>
    <bug_when>2007-01-10 19:01:57 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext> See http://www.w3.org/2007/01/10-ws-policy-irc#T19-01-11

RESOLUTION: 4130 closed with no action. Primer section on wsp:Ignorable should cover use cases and give guidance to policy authors

see issue 4041</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>