<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>4080</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-12-14 17:21:00 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[F+O] Backwards compatibility appendix</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-02-25 23:43:40 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>Functions and Operators 1.0</component>
          <version>Proposed Recommendation</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ashok Malhotra">ashok.malhotra</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13182</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2006-12-14 17:21:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The non-normative backwards compatibility appendix in F+O (Appendix D) lists some incompatibilities in string functions that no longer exist: they were removed during the last call period. Since this appendix is informative only, I suspect there is no objection to us correcting the information during PR.

Note also that in most of these cases, the function signature given in the appendix doesn&apos;t match that in the body text.

I haven&apos;t done a complete trawl, but the incorrect statements include:

concat(): If compatibility mode is off, an error will occur if ... argument is a number or a boolean.

starts-with(): In 1.0, returns false if the first argument is an empty node-set. In 2.0, returns ()

contains(): In 1.0, returns false if the first argument is an empty node-set. In 2.0, returns ()

substring-before(): In 1.0, returns &quot;&quot; if the first argument is an empty node-set. In 2.0, returns ()

substring-after(): In 1.0, returns &quot;&quot; if the first argument is an empty node-set. In 2.0, returns ()

substring(): In 1.0, returns &quot;&quot; if the first argument is an empty node-set. In 2.0, returns ().

normalize-space(): In 1.0, returns &quot;&quot; if the first argument is an empty node-set. In 2.0, returns ()</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13413</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ashok Malhotra">ashok.malhotra</who>
    <bug_when>2007-01-10 15:44:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>On the Jan 9, 2007 telcon the WGs decided to accept the suggestions made by Michael Kay and make the editorial changes.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14145</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Jim Melton">jim.melton</who>
    <bug_when>2007-02-25 23:43:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Closing bug because commenter has not objected to the resolution posted and more than two weeks have passed.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>