4072 2006-12-12 17:18:05 +0000 [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design 2007-03-14 18:17:47 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Policy Guidelines FPWD PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 Daniel.Roth fsasaki public-ws-policy-qa oldest_to_newest 13145 0 Daniel.Roth 2006-12-12 17:18:05 +0000 Title: [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design Description: 1.) Section 4.1, 4th paragraph states: “The number of different subjects to which an assertion can be attached is also a factor when defining an assertion. Determining the appropriate policy subjects can sometimes involve understanding the requirements of wide range of client configurations, from stand alone client applications to "active" web service requestors that are capable of modifying their own configurations dynamically.” [1] Policy assertion authors should not have to consider client configurations, standalone client applications or active clients. 2.) Section 4.1, 5th paragraph discusses when to use policy references. When to use policy references is not relevant to policy assertion authors. Justification: These statements are not relevant to policy assertion authors or policy assertion design. Target: Guidelines for Policy Assertion Authors Proposal: 1.) Remove the paragraph 2.) Remove the paragraph. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-guidelines.html?rev=1.11&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#assertion-target 13865 1 chrisfer 2007-01-31 19:04:52 +0000 [13:59] cferris: rrsagent, where am i? [13:59] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/01/31-ws-policy-irc#T19-00-17 [14:00] *** Ashok has left #ws-policy. [14:00] * umit I am sorry I have to drop out [14:00] Zakim: -umit [14:00] cferris: RESOLUTION: while this doesn't close 4072, it does represent consensus of the group [13:47] PaulC: Leave the following text: [13:47] PaulC: The number of different subjects to which an assertion can be attached is also a factor when defining an assertion. [13:47] PaulC: And follow it with a pointer to subsequent material. [13:48] cferris: in section 4.7 [13:48] PaulC: And remove the next sentence: "Determining the appropriate policy subjects ... dynamically". 14431 2 chrisfer 2007-03-14 18:17:47 +0000 [14:06] scribe: Topic: Issue 4072 [14:07] cferris: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0103.html [14:08] cferris: relates to http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4072 [14:08] scribe: Daniel: This proposal address the remainder of the existing Issue. [14:09] scribe: General text on policy references weren't relevant to assertion design. Recognized however, best practice exists for attachments. Semantics don't have dependency on attachment mechanism used. [14:09] *** ArnaudM has signed off IRC (Quit: CGI:IRC (EOF)). [14:10] scribe: Rewrote Section 4.1 and added Best Practice. [14:10] fhirsch3: q+ [14:11] * Zakim sees fhirsch on the speaker queue [14:12] fhirsch3: q- [14:12] * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue [14:13] scribe: RESOLUTION: Issue 4072 as revised proposal in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0103.html [14:14] cferris: rrsagent, where am i? [14:14] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-ws-policy-irc#T18-14-48