4067 2006-12-11 00:33:18 +0000 ctG001: type subsumption and processContents 2009-01-15 18:14:16 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Test Suite Microsoft tests 2006-11-06 PC Windows XP RESOLVED INVALID metadata updated 2009-01-15 P2 normal --- 1 mike ht public-xml-schema-testsuite oldest_to_newest 13128 0 mike 2006-12-11 00:33:18 +0000 In the Microsoft ComplexType test set, test group ctG001 illustrates what is probably a problem in the spec rather than in the test itself. In the schema, fooType is a restriction of myType. fooType has the particle <element name="myElement"/> where myType has <any processContents="strict"/>. Since there is no global element declaration for myElement, an instance containing myElement would conform to the subtype but not to the base type, meaning that type subsumption is violated. I suspect, though I have not checked carefully, that this is a problem in the specification rather than in the test. Other examples are ctG007-011. 13888 1 zafara 2007-02-02 19:17:22 +0000 The test is valid per spec, the WG should address this issue as intuitively the derived type does not fit within the bounds of the base type. 20733 2 mike 2008-06-22 15:23:16 +0000 Agreed, we might not like the 1.0 spec, but that's the way it's written, so the test should stand. Note however that in 1.1 the schema will be invalid. The bug is therefore classed as INVALID. 23119 3 ht 2009-01-15 18:14:16 +0000 This non-bug has been extended to non-cover ctG007--ctG011 as well